Link to cjcs.com

International Basketball Women

Aug 12th, 2008 | By CJ | Category: Gripes

I’ve been a fan of the WNBA’s Penny Taylor since her days with the now-defunct Cleveland Rockers. Her contribution to the Phoenix Mercury winning the 2007 championship cannot be understated.  And yet, during the Olympics coverage, she engenders less than fannish feeling from me. In spite of her considerable talent, she’s let me down…twice.

Penny Taylor was a late arrival to the Mercury in 2006…the year that Phoenix just missed getting into the playoffs. While they did win by scoring Cappie Pondexter in the following draft, the fact is that she let her team down.  And then this year…not only did she opt not to arrive in Phoenix for the 2/3rds of a season leading up to the Olympics, but after the Games she will not return to the team to try and help them to the playoffs. Her complaints about year-round basketball, while well-founded for us mere mortals, rings somewhat hollow in the face of some many Americans not only playing year-round, but having only a week’s worth of practice before showing up for the Olympics. While I want her back on the team, the lack of loyalty rankles.

Not so with Lauren Jackson. For two Olympic cycles, now, she’s opted to stay in the US and play WNBA basketball against the best players in the world. She travels back to Australia to be with her team when necessary—which, while a bit of a disruption for her team, is a perfectly reasonable thing to do.

I don’t want to lay this all on the players.  The National Teams have a great deal of culpability in this as well.  They often tell players that if they don’t commit to the National Team (i.e. play in the WNBA), then they won’t be allowed on the team. A player of the stature of Lauren Jackson can opt out because the Opals aren’t going to spite themselves by banning arguably the best player in the world. But for two Olympics cycles the Aussies (and Russians and Brazilians) have all but yanked their players from the WNBA, making a shambles of teams trying to fill hard-to-fill holes in their line-ups.

If for no other reason, I’m really pulling for the USA to make a statement on their way to winning gold. That it’s not the team training camps, it’s not the disruptions visited on the very league that is making their players contenders, but the caliber of day-in day-out play that makes a champion.  If the USA can bring in year-round players, yanked from the middle of a league’s season, give them about of week of practice, and then go on to victory…well, I can’t think of any more emphatic statement than that.

No…I’m not bitter.  Why do you ask?

Do you have something you'd like to say about this article?
Scroll down to the comments section and tell us what you think.


Related Posts

  • 2008 WNBA Finals Pre-Series Thoughts: Detroit vs San Antonio
    What an interesting road to the finals, eh? All of the 2008 playoff series up until this point have gone the distance. I think it's fair to say that parity has hit the WNBA. Will the finals be any dif...
  • WNBA 2008 Conference Finals Breakdown
    A quick breakdown of the 2008 WNBA conference finals of New York vs Detroit; and Los Angeles vs San Antonio. Who is likely to win?...
  • WTF Was Steve Key Thinking?
    It's become clear that the Chicago Sky and Kristi Toliver haven't exactly had the most ideal of campaigns in 2009. Seems to me like Head Coach and GM Steve Key erred on draft day....
  • The 2009 WNBA 11-player Roster SNAFU
    The WNBA has had a history of making very considered moves to help the league not only survive but grow. This past offseason, due to the effects of the economic downslide, the WNBA announced that, for...
  • 2009 WNBA Draft – Last Thoughts Before the Draft
    Now, having seen the players playing outside of their conferences at season's end, as well has having more information concerning WNBA team needs, and factoring the comments from around the web about ...

Tags: , , , , , ,

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.